Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings
The increase in ESG investing insists businesses reflect a positive corporate social responsibility image. More and more millennials are joining the investment community, which urges companies to act in such a way that appeals to the investors. In fact, investors recognize corporate social responsibility as a more relevant measure of a company’s performance than quarterly earnings. But, measuring the ESG performance is quite challenging. This is the reason why many investors focus more on short-term financial metrics because they have some idea of a company’s profits but don’t know what its ESG performance is.
Thus, ESG rating agencies collect and aggregate
information on an organization’s ESG performance and come up with an ESG score.
However, different agencies disagree on a company’s ESG performance, which
results in troublesome divergence in ESG ratings.
Is a High ESG Rating Good?
ESG reports and ratings are an important tool for investors,
financial managers, or asset holders that measure a company’s performance
against the industry peers. Organizations with a good ESG rating are believed
to be better equipped to address potential risks or opportunities and to
embrace long-term value creation over short-term profits. Companies with a good
ESG score are more resilient over time. Thus, a good ESG rating helps companies
attract investors and lower the financing cost.
What Do ESG Ratings Measure?
ESG rating is used to assess a company’s exposure to
environmental, social, and governance risks. It includes non-financial metrics
that measure risks a company has faced. Environmental metrics include risks,
like waste management, greenhouse gases emission, energy efficiency, etc.
Social metrics measure social/human capital risks, including data security,
employee health/safety, product safety, and more! Governance metrics measure
risks, like business ethics, transparency, etc.
How Are ESG Ratings Calculated?
ESG rating agencies rate organizations based on
their ESG policies, systems, or measures and the information they gather from
multiple sources, like media, NGOs, publications, or stakeholders. They can
also use a questionnaire to collect more information about the company. These
agencies use a mechanism to adjust the ESG score of the companies based on the
industry. Simultaneously, they also use a company's relative performance
against their peers to calculate a universal ESG rating.
Correlation of ESG Ratings
As already discussed, interested parties contract
with different agencies that give ESG ratings to the firms based on different
criteria. However, researchers at MIT Sloan have found that ESG ratings vary
tremendously among the agencies. It was found that the correlation among the
agencies was on average 0.61. Credit ratings from Standard Ratings & Poor’s
and Moody’s are correlated at 0.99. This reflects inconsistent and ambiguous
ESG ratings. Such discrepancies in the ESG ratings may lead to real-world
consequences.
Conclusion
As ESG is calculated with different methodologies,
it is bound to diverge. It is tough to believe one agency more than the other
when it comes to the ESG ratings. But the silver lining is that ESG ratings’
concept is still in its infant stage. Since it is a central topic for
investors, time will tell how successful the improvement attempts will be.
Relevant Keywords - is a high esg rating good, what do esg ratings measure, how are esg ratings calculated, correlation of esg ratings.

Comments
Post a Comment